Title: Tessa Masterson Will Got to Prom [indie bound] [amazon]
Author: Brendan Halpin [website] [twitter] & Emily Franklin [website]
Genre:  Contemporary
Publisher: Walker and Company
Series: None
Format: eBook (ARC)
Source: Publisher (via Net Galley)
Reviewer: Michelle
Parental Advisory: GLBT, language
Teachable Moments: sexual identity, loyalty

“So he’s why.  Lucas needed to know the truth, and I had to be the one to tell him.  Somehow, telling Lucas is like admitting that it’s real.  The it — the liking girls — isn’t going to evaporate.”

Summary (from the publisher):
If someone hurts your sister and you’re any kind of man, you seek revenge, right?  If your brother’s been accused of a terrible crime and you’re the main witness, then you banish all doubt and defend him.  Isn’t Lucas and Tessa’s friendship is the stuff of legend in their small Midwestern town.  So it’s no surprise when Lucas finally realizes his feelings for Tessa are more than friendship and he asks her to prom.  What no one expected, especially Lucas, was for Tessa to come out as a lesbian instead of accepting his heartfelt invitation.  Humiliated and confused, Lucas also feels betrayed that his best friend kept such an important secret from him.

What’s worse is Tessa’s decision to wear a tastefully tailored tuxedo to escort her female crush, sparking a firestorm of controversy.  Lucas must decide if he should stand on the sidelines or if he should stand by his friend to make sure that Tessa Masterson will go to prom.

Opinion:
Tessa and her best friend Lucas have been tied at the hip since they were young children.  Regarded by most in their small town as the “it” couple that haven’t quite gotten it together romantically it is surprising to most when the unimaginable happens.  Lucas and the rest of town discover, after his humiliating billboard sized invite to the prom is declined, that Tessa is gay. This sparks a town-wide revolt when Tessa decides she wants to go to prom with a girl and *gasp* wants to wear a tux to boot.  The furtherance of the book goes on to show the conflict between Tessa and just about everyone — her parents, Lucas, her high school and the townspeople.  She even has to deal with the matter seeping out into larger US population as a whole.

Halpin and Franklin have crafted a quite serious book wrapped in a somewhat light package.  What do I mean by this?  Well, they touch on a young girl’s coming out, the fall out of it as it were, in a way that gives the subject matter appropriate depth and meaning while still making the story entertaining.  This is done not through the plot (which is pretty straight-forward and not all that unique) or the setting (typical small town fare) but rather the dynamic characters.   Specifically Tessa, who (as one would expect) has a pretty tough go of things after her proclamation to Lucas that she’s just not that into him.

So let me start there.  Tessa was a great girl-power kind of character.  She was inspirational in her actions while still being a regular teenaged girl with problems.    What made the book for me wasn’t that Tessa was struggling with her sexuality.  Because, she really wasn’t.  She knew she was gay and didn’t have any problem embracing it.  Where she encountered the struggle was in timing her admission, helping those around her deal with her it and and making sure that her relationships remained in tact.  It took her quite some time to make her sexuality known to the public but once done she did she was willing to fight for her rights regardless of her preference.

Enter the great prom debacle.  Once it was discovered that Tessa was going to go to the prom in a tux and with a girl all hell broke loose.  School tried to ban her and then the prom got canceled all together. As a result her life at school suffered (kids blamed her for the prom not happening), her life at home suffered (her parents livelihood was put in jeopardy), and her friendships undoubtedly suffered (Lucas wanted nothing to do with her).  It’s in the latter that the most enjoyable portions of the book occurred.  Seeing Tessa experience and overcome the loss of a lifelong friend was both emotional and enjoyable.  Watching her journey of self-discovery as it related to the trust and loyalty issues Lucas brought up was quite interesting. While he initially struggled with the fact that she was gay he felt the ultimate in betrayal because she waited so long to tell him.  He was under the impression that their friendship was based on complete honesty.  He shared everything with her only to find out she did not return in kind.  It was devastating for him.

Which brings me to Lucas.  I found him realistically painted.  He was so conflicted over it all.  A true and loyal friend he was genuinely hurt by Tessa’s refusal of his love but then even more so when he discovered she’d been holding back the truth for so long.  Then how widespread that lie by omission really was.  He had his moments of jackassery as a result.  He was childish, spiteful, rude and self-involved when it came to the aftermath of Tessa’s admission.  But, for me, that is what made him true.  He was dependable when it counted and angry when it suited him.

There was some touching family interaction, some sweet romance, and great friendships portrayed thoughout Tessa Masterson’s story.  A quite little book that teaches a lesson loud and clear.

Title: Ashfall
Author: Mike Mullin [website] [twitter] [facebook]
Genre: Dystopian
Publisher: Tanglewood Press
Series: Ashfall
Format: ebook
Source: Purchased
Reviewer: Laura
Parental Advisory: death, violence, rape
Teachable Moments: survival, friendship, teamwork

“For the first time ever, I felt ashamed of my species. The volcano had taken our homes, our food, our automobiles, and our airplanes, but it hadn’t taken our humanity. No, we’d given that up on our own.”

Summary (from the publisher):
Under the bubbling hot springs and geysers of Yellowstone National Park is a super-volcano. Most people don’t know it’s there. The caldera is so large that it can only be seen from a plane or satellite. It just could be overdue for an eruption, which would change the landscape and climate of our planet.

Ashfall is the story of Alex, a teenage boy left alone for the weekend while his parents visit relatives. When the Yellowstone super-volcano erupts unexpectedly, Alex is determined to reach his parents. He must travel over a hundred miles in a landscape transformed by a foot of ash and the destruction of every modern convenience that he has ever known, and through a new world in which disaster has brought out both the best and worst in people desperate for food, water, and warmth. With a combination of nonstop action, a little romance, and very real science, this is a story that is difficult to stop reading and even more difficult to forget.

Opinion:
One of my many book addictions is the “End of the World As We Know It” story or otherwise known as “Oh-My-Good-Golly-What–Do-We-Do-Now?” book!

Over the years, these tales began to possess similar plots, events, scares, and attitudes but Mike Mullin’s Ashfall felt like a brand new bag to me in many ways. It held such inspiration, morality, and hope in the pages. This story felt more like a journey towards a new way of living in a new world rather than the beginning of the end.

After a super-volcano erupts in Yellowstone National Park, Alex’s weekend of freedom away from his family turns into an unimaginable journey of survival in a world now covered in ash, darkness, unpredictable weather, violence, pain, loss, hunger, and fear.  Setting off on foot (and skis) he treks across Iowa on a mission to find his family.  What he discovers along the way is so much more; his battle to survive brings him face to face with new friends, horrible foes, and a girl named Darla.

Alex and Darla are flat out amazing! While this book does not shy away from the harsh nature of survival it places great emphasis on the power of love as well.  These two were adorable, smart, strong, and caring towards each other and the people they came across on the road. It was a joy to watch them conquer a problem with patience, strength, smarts, and grace. Alex and Darla encouraged, leaned on each other, and were not afraid to let the other one lead at times. They made my heart happy! It was just so refreshing to see intelligent young adults with a “we-should-try-it-how-hard-can-it-be” attitude. I fell in love with both of them, but Darla, she was my hero. That girl rocks!

Some of my favorite parts of Ashfall were the detailed lessons for the different techniques Alex and Darla used to help them survive. They combined their knowledge to practice skills used in their previous lives as well as skills they had read about.  Adding in good use of their common sense they were able to put thought into action to battle the elements and starvation. I truly admired their attitudes through the highs and lows of their travels. I would have wanted to curl up and die at points, but they constantly pushed each other to keep learning and trying. Much of the science and skills (such as pig farming, greenhouses, smoking meat, and grinding corn) were well explained point by point.  However, the author did well to piqued the reader’s interest for further research of topics. I often found myself asking—is that true? I enjoyed all the survival lessons—even the gross ones!

As many dystopian stories do, this one showed the ugly side of a society struggling to survive.  The good thing is that it also encouraged the best to shine through as well. My hat goes off to you, Mr. Mullin, you have written an end-of-the-world-as-we know-it story, but infused it with hope. Hope in love. Hope in humanity. Survival is key, but who we choose to surround ourselves with and how and what we do to survive should be the most important parts of the journey.

It was a very refreshing take on the genre and I can’t wait for more!

Hey ho, whaddaya know?  It’s Michelle and Andi here!  In a small freakish moment in nature she and I happened to unexpected read the same book at the same time.  Fortunately for you that means you get to hear us gab about it.  We have thoughts people, very serious thoughts.  Check out what they are:

Title: The Rivals [indie bound] [amazon]
Author: Daisy Whitney [website] [twitter] [facebook]
Genre:  Contemporary
Publisher: Little Brown Books for Young Readers
Series: The Mockingbirds
Format: Print (ARC)
Source: Publisher (via BEA)
Reviewer: Michelle & Andi
Parental Advisory: sex, alcohol, drugs, language
Teachable Moments: rape, cheating

Michelle
What did you think about the story overall?  I have to say I liked The Mockingbirds better.  I felt like this book (while good) wasn’t a necessary extension of the first.  Having said that I quite enjoyed catching up with Alex and liked seeing her growth since what happened with Carter.  The story itself made sense to me, that there would be a cadre of people who rebel against the Mockingbirds (even if I saw the plot points and progressions pretty early on) and that there were some who still didn’t believe Alex.  I’m still on the fence about the school administration though.  It felt a bit too over the top, that any school administrator would be so blatant about turning a blind eye or that those that were aware of The Mockingbirds wouldn’t do more about it.

Andi
For me this book was close to being excellent, but something made it a little off from the greatness of The Mockingbirds. I tried to figure out if it was the case, the new people, the slight shift in Alex’s personality, but it wasn’t any of that. I actually liked how Alex was always on the line of deceptive and straight forward. It worked, and so did the new people. It was the administration that bothered me. It was too much of a plot point to make the head master be that ‘turn a blind eye to win an award’ like. It was very contrived and it took away from what Alex and The Mockingbirds were up against and made everything they did whether good or bad okay because the administration was the bad guys in the long run.

Michelle
Yes!  I felt like the award thing was way too convenient.  Particularly given the fact that the precedent had been set in the previous book that the administrator never paid much attention to goings on.  Also, I think the focus on that element took away from the strength of The Mockingbirds. As a group it felt far more public in this book where as in the last they were more covert and at least tried to fly under the radar.  It felt like vigilantism was being flaunted as opposed to being a means to an end.

What are your thoughts on the case that was being investigated?

I was kind of torn.  I liked that Whitney spoke to a relevant topic on a much grander scale (cheating) but part of me felt like one of the best things about The Mockingbirds was that they gave a voice to an individual who was wronged.  Rivals took away from that some for me.  It lost some of it’s emotion and urgency because there wasn’t one single person being focused on.  BUT, I don’t think this book was as much about The Mockingbirds as it was a continuation of Alex’s story.

Andi
Like you I was torn too.  I got that it was used as a way to justify the means, to show that not everything was so black and white and clear cut. I liked that aspect of it. But I had trouble believing that a high school senior, even someone like Alex, would go that hardcore against a cheating ring. There was something about the case that just didn’t work for me. Was the mystery aspect of who was behind it good? Absolutely. But I couldn’t help but think it would be even better if the case was more individualized. I just couldn’t see a kid caring about cheating if it really wasn’t affecting them and I struggled with that.

Michelle
Again, I agree!  In my high school it was pretty much keep your nose down and stay out of it. Now, this doesn’t necessarily mean that such things are always that way I can see where it could be this way.  But it seems far less plausible to me.  Did you feel like it was a mystery?  Because I knew what was going on pretty early on.  There were a few places where things worked out differently than I expected but it wasn’t overwhelmingly surprising overall.

Andi
Oh, definitely not a surprise to me. I saw the writing on the wall from the get-go, but the attempt at a mystery was there for sure. Whitney wanted to keep you guessing, but for two amazing astute readers like ourselves…come on now. ;-)

What did you think of Alex and Martin’s relationship?

Their relationship was the one aspect I 100% loved. The growth and love from what they were in The Mockingbirds was pretty amazingly done in my eyes. It was the part of the story that I just found very real. The problems they had, the insecurities, that is all typical high school, if not just relationship stuff that couples go through. Sure their was the added pressure of working together and not always agreeing on the course of action to take, but their relationship was totally relatable and added to the book instead of just being there to add some romance.

Michelle
I was more drawn to their relationship in the first than this one.  She was a bit unkind to him (understandably so) in some respects.  I enjoyed that he handled it well.  I do like that their relationship was portrayed realistically.  She was distant and he was hurt.  There was some spitefulness and childishness.  No Dawson’s Creek action here where they were far to wise and introspective for their own good.  I liked that a lot.

What did you think about her attraction to the other boy?  I’m forgetting his name, UGH.

Andi
Jones! Oh Jones. I guess I was annoyed more with Jones then her attraction to him. I kind of understood the attraction because he was completely separate from everything else that was going on. He wasn’t in The Mockingbirds and he wasn’t in the circle of friends that she wasn’t trusting anymore. He was her Jones, her soft place, her music guy. But personally I thought Jones was pretentious and full of himself and that is what bothered me. He really acted like he was above all things Mockingbirds and I couldn’t figure out why he felt so entitled.

Michelle
Yes, Jones!  Thank you!  See that’s one of the problems for me is that we didn’t have all that much time with him.  To really get to know him outside of the peripheral.  That made it harder to understand why she would be so inclined to give up what she had with Martin for Jones.  I do get the inclination to gravitate towards him for the reasons you mention but why allude to potential romance.  You can get that connection through friendship, you know?  I agree that he had arrogance about him and I wonder if it was intended to be felt as more aloof than anything else.  I didn’t much mind about his personality just because I knew his purpose was to be conflict for she and Martin.

Speaking of which, I didn’t feel like that was a necessary focus for the story.  There was already so much conflict in the plot already that there wasn’t a need to have a third party element to the romance.

Andi
Maybe that’s the problem that I was thinking of him from both books, like I couldn’t separate the two. I guess I’m just not a Jones fan. LOL. But I totally get what you are saying. The extra conflict was just that…extra. There was plenty immerse yourself in without it. Was it supposed to show the strength of Alex and Martin or what? Kind of pointless is right.

Michelle
I think so.  Also, I think it went to show that Alex was healing from the rape.  That she could open herself up to the idea of dating not just one man but potentially someone else as well.  In that way I think it worked well.  She had far more interaction with boys in this book and I found that aspect was handled really well.

What did you think of Alex’s character development from book one?

Andi
Now that part I honestly thought was really well done. From book one to The Rivals you could notice the change in Alex. Like she said in the book, as much as she wanted to be that same girl from before the rape, the one that went under the radar she couldn’t. She was different and I think Whitney showed that really well. I loved even in just The Rivals how at the beginning Alex was afraid to face Natalie, who I can’t stand by the way, and then at the end she refused to let her bully her. She found who she was and how being raped made her able to withstand things the old Alex never would have. Once she stopped running from her past she was no longer her past, she was the girl that did something about it and took control back of her life. You know?

Michelle
I do!  What I liked best about it was that her progress was slow and thoughtful.  It wasn’t this huge grand sweeping change that happens in 2.5 seconds so that the story can be conveniently done.  She was still traumatized by the rape and had appropriate reactions when seeing Carter at different times.  I also liked that she was able to continue to move forward with Martin and that she opened herself up to multiple possibilities where romance and intimacy were concerned.  Not sure I’m on board with her getting to sexy times with him as quickly as she did.  I would have imagined it taking longer given where she was in the first book.  But that’s just me.  Did it feel too fast for that to you?

Andi
I can see how people would think it was very fast that she was okay to sleep with Martin. But I can also see why it was important for Alex to actually let herself be with someone like that. It was more, to me anyway, to show that the rape didn’t define her and that she was in a safe place with Martin. Martin made her feel like the Alex of old so it was natural that she would be okay to be intimate with him. Fast, maybe a little, but I think it was a way for Alex to grow and for the rape to have been something that happened to her, not who she was.

Michelle
This is true, it’s difficult not to let something like that define you so plowing ahead to try and make positive changes is definitely an encouraging message.

Any final thoughts to share?

Andi
All in all I really enjoyed the book. It was nice to see some character growth. There were things I would have lied to have been different, but in the end I think it all worked as a whole. I do get the feeling of a possible third part, but time will tell. I know I’m excited for whatever Ms. Whitney has for us next.

Did you read it?  What did you think?  Add your thoughts to the comment.

Title: Shooting Stars  [indie bound] [amazon]
Author:
Allison Rushby[website]  [twitter] [facebook]
Genre:
Contemporary
Publisher:
Walker & Company
Series:
None
Format:
eBook (ARC)
Source:
Publisher (via Net Galley)
Reviewer:
Andi
Parental Advisory:
criminal activity
Teachable Moments:
work-ethic, abandonment, independence

“The world would be a boring place if we were all the same.”

Summary(from the publisher):
Meet Josephine Foster, or Zo Jo as she’s called in the biz. The best pint-sized photographer of them all, Jo doesn’t mind doing what it takes to get that perfect shot, until she’s sent on an undercover assignment to shoot Ned Hartnett—teen superstar and the only celebrity who’s ever been kind to her—at an exclusive rehabilitation retreat in Boston. The money will be enough to pay for Jo’s dream: real photography classes, and maybe even quitting her paparazzi gig for good. Everyone wants to know what Ned’s in for. But Jo certainly doesn’t know what she’s in for: falling in love with Ned was never supposed to be part of her assignment.

Opinion:
I was really excited for this book when I read about it months ago. The premise sounded like it would be right up my alley. I mean, who doesn’t love a story where the lead character falls for the person she is supposed to? It’s a classic. But, sadly, this one fell a little flat for me.  It felt somewhat unbelievable.

The story is about Jo, a 16 year old paparazzo, that is trying to make money so she can get out of the business and take photography classes. Having been taught by watching her dad (one of the best known ‘Zo’s’ in the business) she followed his footsteps out of convenience and obligation but really wants to study photography as art. As a teen who is petite and has the looks to match her age it works to her advantage, allowing her to get into places other photogs can’t. Given those qualities she is offered a job to head to Boston and ‘spy’ on a music celebrity who has recently checked himself into a rehab facility focused on young adults.  Desperate to get out of the business, Jo agrees to take on the assignment because the money is just too good to resist.  As one might expect, when she gets to the facility Jo learns there is more to both the situation and the boy she’s investigating.   It’s in this experience that she ultimately discovers how difficult it is to keep emotions in line when feelings start to develop for the subject.

To be honest I’m not sure what it was specifically I didn’t really enjoy about this book. Well, wait, that isn’t true. Jo was a really big part of my problem with the story. I didn’t feel like I got to know her like I should have.  As reader I wanted to feel bad for her when she found herself in a pickle but I didn’t because everything about her was so surface level. There was definitely potential for more depth but it was always hidden behind her camera, or her fauxpod as she called it. There were moments when the real Jo made an appearance.  For example, she showed traces of depth when she talked about her trust issues and a little about her past and relationship with her dad.  Unfortunately it was short-lived and felt peripheral. I wanted to know more about her abandonment issues.  Her mother’s departure and her father’s need to travel for work leaving her on her own deeply effected her everyday life but it was never really explored with any great focus. I felt like I knew Katrina (one of the supporting characters) better than Jo and it didn’t sit well with me.

What I did enjoy was Jo and Ned’s relationship.  The friendship they created in the treatment facility was real and easy. It was the one time when I could actually feel an emotion from Jo. Every time she talked to him and had to lie I could feel her guilt. She was doing what she had to, but she liked Ned so much that it was eating her up inside. The strength of her character and the story was exhibited best when she wasn’t hiding behind her camera; when she was spending time with Ned. Ned got Jo talking about herself and that was what I wanted more of.  I would have enjoyed the story more had it been told from their dual perspective instead of just Jo’s. It would have been nice to see both sides of the coin and I think it would have done wonders for their story and my feelings on the outcome.

Thought this wasn’t a book that worked particularly well for me, it may be more your speed.  Pick yourself up a copy and see where you fall.

Hey guys, Andi here! I went and saw The Hunger Games movie and I wanted to share my thoughts on both the book and the movie adaption. I’ve invited my friend Heather to chat with me.  This is her first ever blog post so say hi and be kind ;-) ! We apologize in advance if we give anything away about the book or movie, but it must be said…if you haven’t read the series or seen the movie, get your tush out there and do both!

Andi: Um, I have one word for this movie…FANTASTICAL! Wait, is that even a word? Hmmm… Ah whatever! Word or no word, The Hunger Games was just that…it was FANATASTICAL! I was very, very nervous after all the hype, but the hype, the hype was worth it and more. Would you agree Ms. Heather?

Heather:  I would TOTALLY agree.  It was, as you put it, FANTASTICAL and then some!  The hype definitely gave me pause because when you’ve loved a book so much and then it’s adapted to screen, you get nervous when everyone is singing its praises. I didn’t want to come out of the theater disappointed and I didn’t.  Not even a little bit.

One of the things I was most impressed with was the casting.  I thought it was so well done.  What did you think, Andi?

A: The casting was so spot on. I know there was a lot of contention when the cast was released. I’m not gonna lie, I was one of those worried people. I wasn’t sure Lenny Kravitz would be a good Cinna and not knowing Jennifer Lawrence I didn’t know if she could pull off the awesomeness that is the character of Katniss. But I will fully eat my words because not only was Lenny a pretty perfect Cinna, Jennifer Lawrence carried that film on her back and made Katniss into what she was written to be. She managed to get across the strength, the fear, the uncertainty and the power of the character across with just her looks. I actually believe she was Katniss and that was so important for this film to be a success.

H:  It’s funny you say that about Lenny Kravtiz because I thought he’d be a perfect Cinna the first time I saw he was who had been cast in the role! Funny how people see things differently when you picture them in your mind.  Maybe it was because I read the books later and the cast had already been announced, but I thought from early on that the casting sounded pretty good.  Like you, I didn’t know much about Jennifer Lawrence, so I wasn’t sure what to expect from her, but I think she did a fantastic job and as you said, she really carried the film.  She embodied what Katniss should have been, a strong, able heroine.

You know the other thing that struck me about the casting was that I thought Josh Hutcherson was a great choice as Peeta.  To me Peeta always seemed like he was the underdog because he didn’t have that established relationship with Katniss like Gale did in the beginning.  I thought Josh, and then with Liam Hemsworth as Gale, established that well.  Josh is a cutie, but he’s not conventionally hot.  Does that make sense?

A: That makes totally sense. Josh has that silent cuteness to him and it worked for Peeta. He was charming when he had to be like the character was in the book, but he also was thinking a lot and you could see that all over Josh’s face. His mind was always moving and calculating what his next move should be to protect him and Katniss. It was really well done and I got the same feelings I did from the book watching him.

I know there was some talk about no chemistry between Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson but I didn’t really get that. To me it came off exactly how the book relationship felt to me. He was head over heels for her and she was kind of aloof because she didn’t know what she felt about him or the games. When they were in the cave I definitely felt it and thought it was real, but after and before that I think it was portrayed spot on.  What did you think about it?

H:  I was hoping we’d get to the “no chemistry” talk about Jennifer and Josh!  I agree with you that it came off exactly as it did in the book for me.  As I mentioned earlier, Katniss had an established relationship with Gale and that was evident to me, especially when he came to see her right before she left for the Capitol.  The way Katniss launched herself into Gale’s arms; you could see and feel that connection.  I think there was a good connection between Jennifer and Liam too.

With Peeta, Katniss didn’t have that connection.  All she had was the memory of seeing that young boy throw burnt bread at her feet and I think that was confusing for her when she saw him at first, let alone hearing that this now much older boy had a crush on her and had for years.  I think it was perfectly played on Jennifer’s part because Katniss didn’t know how to feel about Peeta’s declaration, then she sees him with the other tributes once they were in the arena and I think she was trying to figure out if he was “with” them or if he was trying to protect her, so the chemistry at that point in the movie might have been less, but I think it SHOULD have been.  Once they got to the cave, you could definitely see the chemistry increase and it was there between the actors.  I felt the connection between them in those scenes.  There is no question that the aftermath of the cave scenes was played perfectly too.

Since we’re still talking about casting, what did you think of Elizabeth Banks’ Effie and Woody Harrelson’s Haymitch?  I heard some scuttle that people didn’t care for Harrelson, but loved Banks.  Personally I loved them both, but…

A: I thought they were spot on as the characters they were cast as. Banks was the perfect Effie. She was so clueless and worried about appearances. And Harrelson was a great Haymitch. If I did have one complaint about him was that there wasn’t enough. We didn’t get to really see the relationship that developed between Katniss and him. I mean I get that that was a timing thing, but I wish there was just a little bit more. In the book they had a great push/pull thing between them and I just wanted to see that on the screen. But other then that no complaints about the cast at all.

And with that let’s move on to the setting. What did you think about the actual set designs? Was it what you would have pictured Panem and the districts to look like? What about the arena?

I must say everything was spot on to the vision in my head but for one thing and it is really my only complaint about the film and it is so ridiculously minor, but it made me crazy. The Cornucopia.   Oh man did they screw up the look of the Cornucopia. Silver mirrored?! I think not. The Cornucopia was gold and much, much larger. That just totally disappointed me. But everything else was exactly what I would imagine it to have looked like.

H:  I thought everything as far as set design was pretty close to what I had envisioned in my head with the exception of the same thing you disliked… the Cornucopia.  I couldn’t believe that it was silver mirrored!  To me that was the biggest disappointment of the film.  I, like you, envisioned it being larger, but I also had a vision of it being more rustic.  Definitely gold in color, but since they were in the middle of basically the wilderness, I just thought it would not be as modern and futuristic looking as it was, even though this story is obviously set in the future.  It looked sorely out of place to me.

I felt they did a great job with the districts.  District 12 had that very downtrodden feeling that you got out of the descriptions in the book and I think it really gave you a good feeling of where Katniss came from and the struggles that the citizens of that district faced on a daily basis.

This may not totally pertain to sets, but it does in a way because I’m talking about “Games Control.”  One of the things that I really thought was cool was getting to see how Seneca Crane really played “gamemaker.”  I had wondered how they would do that in the film and I thought it was done so well.  I loved getting an inside look at the control center and how he directed when the tracker jackers were introduced and the fire, etc.

A: That had to have been the coolest part of the whole movie. The room were the Games were controlled was off the hook awesome! That really showed the kind of future world they were living it and gave an even more sinister feel to the “gamemakers”. Getting to see just how much they controlled and how they decided to change the games as they went was pretty ingenious and gave me the chills. It was definitely a more in depth look at it then was in the book.

The other thing that I really enjoyed was how they shared with the viewers the stuff that was in Katniss’ head in the book. Like when she was in the arena in the book we were able to see what she was thinking and since they obviously can’t do it that way in a movie, having Stanley Tucci’s character Caesar Flickerman tell us like we were the actual audience watching the Hunger Games in Panem was a pretty creative way to get it all across.

Now let me ask you what you thought of the camera shakiness? I heard a lot of complaints and was curious what you thought about that part of it?

H:  Honestly, I think the camera shakiness just added another layer to what the film was.  So much is shown from the perspective of the characters and when you’re running through the wilderness or through a body of water, you’re going to be moving all over the place.  It gave it a realistic feel in my opinion.  I could see how it would bother some people though because there were some times it was super shaky.  You know the one thing I thought was cool about having the shaky effect was?  They were able to showcase the killings and some of the more gruesome moments without it being totally gruesome.  With the quick, shaky camera shots you got the gist of what was going on, but you didn’t have to look for long at what was happening.

What did you think of it?  Did it bother you a lot?

A: I actually think it added to the movie. The shaky camera to me was a tool used to show the fear that these kids were facing both at the reaping and in the actual arena. It made me feel twitchy and jittery and I would imagine that would be how a person would feel if put in that situation. Like you said it made it feel realistic. And that’s a really good point about the killings/violence. It made it watchable when you weren’t looking at it head on. I didn’t even think of that. Nice call Heather.

Favorite scene in the movie?

H:  Ooh, that’s a tough one…Can I have two?! LOL There are two scenes that come to mind for me right away and for very different reasons.  The first is when Katniss goes in for her evaluation.  To me her shooting the apple out of the pig’s mouth was the first time she really flexed her heroine muscle and I just wanted to cheer for her because it’s so rare that the female main character gets to kind of stick it to everyone.  I loved that!  Honestly I think that is one of the reasons I loved these books so much is because for once the woman was the one to root for!  The second scene(s) are those that Katniss had with Rue following her demise and the care she took putting the flowers around her.  I just thought that showed the kind of person Katniss really is even if she wasn’t so good with words, as she put it.

How about you?  What was your favorite?

A: Those were some really great, powerful Katniss moments. I do love that she was such a fierce heroine. She is who little girls should look up to in books. But as great as those both were mine is when Katniss showed her vulnerable side. She very rarely cried or showed emotion going into the games assuming it would show weakness. She was strong and stoic to a point. So when she was getting ready to actual enter the arena and it was just Cinna and her and they weren’t saying anything but she was visibly shaking I felt the human part of Katniss. She was no longer the girl that fed her family, that looked after her sister, that put her life on the line for Prim. She was a scared 16 year old girl that was about to fight to the death for her life. In that one scene she said so much without saying a single word. That was my favorite part hands down.

H:  Good choice!  I liked all the scenes that Jennifer Lawrence and Lenny Kravitz had together.  I thought they were great scene partners. I also felt like Katniss’ relationship with Cinna in the book was one of the most stable she had and she trusted him to point her in the right direction, she was able to vulnerable with him and his vote of confidence right before she went into the arena was invaluable.  I wish they had been able to explore that relationship a little bit more on-screen.

A: It’s funny that you noticed the comfort level between Jennifer and Lenny in their scenes together. It actually wasn’t that far of a stretch for her to trust him. Jennifer Lawrence is friends with his daughter Zoe in real life and has been going over his house for years. Like most kids call their friend’s parents she calls him Mr. Kravitz and got the whole cast doing it. Just a little behind the scenes trivia for you. J

So in comparison to the book, which we both loved to pieces, how do you think they fared in making this into a movie?

H:  That’s really interesting about Jennifer and Lenny!  I had no idea!  Here’s another little tidbit before I answer your question, I read that when Wes Bentley (Seneca Crane) got down here to Charlotte to film, he had a full beard and so the hair stylists just took what he already had and sculpted the beard he had in the movie.  The funny thing was that he had his family down here and filming had moved into one of the more rural areas up toward the mountains and he had to go to Target to pick up some formula and he said the people looked at him like he’d stepped out of a different time with the futuristic design.  They weren’t used to seeing that type of facial hair!

Okay, so back to your question…I think they did an excellent job of bringing this extraordinary story to life.  I’ve seen a lot of films that have been adapted from books and nine times out of ten there is some major flaw or they’ve changed a huge plot point in the film version that makes you grit your teeth.  That didn’t happen with this movie for me.  With the amazing job they did with casting and the attention to detail, I think they nailed it.  There are always going to be things from the book that there just aren’t enough time to include or develop, but when you look at the big picture, I think that The Hunger Games ranks high on the list of success stories when it comes to creating a world that we’ve all imagined in our minds and making it come to life.

A: They really did do an amazing job. They did the important stuff right out of the book and then tweaked other things to make them work for a film adaption. Like you said 9 out of 10 times it just doesn’t translate and I felt like this time it just worked. Makes me hopeful for the last 2 books. Catching Fire is going to be off the hook good!

Anything else you want to add?

H:  Catching Fire was my favorite of the three books, so like you I think it will be off the hook good as a movie.  I have high hopes for it anyway!  Seriously I hadn’t been this excited about a movie in a long, long time and this lived up to my expectations and then some.  For the first time in eons I’ve already said I want to see this again in the theater not to mention buying it when it comes out on DVD.

Thanks so much for including me in this.  It’s been fun and I hope everyone has enjoyed reading our thoughts.  And, like Andi said, if you haven’t read the books, read them and then hightail it to the closest theater and see this great piece of cinematography!

A: And scene.  :-)

Thanks for helping out Heather. It was a pleasure having you.

So these are our thoughts. What do you think?

Better In Pink